The Mayor’s Election Day “Diversity Plan” for District 1:

School is back in session. Election Day arrived. And yesterday, Mayor De Blasio’s Department of Education announced a new enrollment proposal for pre-k and kindergarten admissions in Community School District 1.

The results are now in: the Mayor’s “plan” has not earned this Council’s vote.

Over many years, the parent leaders of District 1 have done our homework:

  • We sounded the alarm about school segregation before it became fashionable for political candidates to have a “diversity plan.”

  • We searched for communities that have tackled segregation, and we found the leading expert in the field.

  • We secured a federally-funded, NY state grant to introduce an evidence-based, enrollment model called “controlled choice.”

  • And with the help of our D1 Mom Squad, we spread the word and earned the community’s support.

By contrast, today the Department of Education:

  • Proposes a new policy not backed by available research,

  • Plans to spend federally-funded state money on this new policy, knowing that it cannot achieve our shared integration goals, and

  • Measures success according to the loose criteria from the Mayor’s “diversity plan,” widely described by NYC education reporters as… “not a plan.”

Today and in the past, we have called out District and DOE leadership for their secrecy and delay tactics that have harmed the prospects for integration and equity in our schools.

At the same time, we also acknowledge that DOE has heard some of our concerns. The DOE’s new proposal contains fairness principles that any good plan should have. The proposal:

  • Applies to the entire school district and not just a few schools,

  • Applies to both pre-K and kindergarten enrollment policies, and

  • Proposes that each school’s population should reflect the local community with regards to a student’s family income, language, and housing status.

But despite these improvements, the DOE’s plan is not one that our students deserve. And it is not one that our families have asked for.

Our fight for equity and against segregation is a campaign, not a grant program. We, the parent leaders of the Community Education Council will continue to advocate for our community, regardless of how this DOE policy plays out. And we will continue to hold the District accountable for their actions.

About the DOE Proposal, and our many questions:

The DOE today released its Diversity in Admissions proposal for priority choice enrollment at our schools and for a new family resource center. The proposal may sound like the controlled choice plan developed by leading experts and endorsed by the District 1 Community Education Council. But it is not that plan, and it does not benefit from decades of research and data.

Under the DOE proposal, students who qualify for free or reduced lunch, English language learners, and students in temporary housing will receive priority admission to their school of choice. The aspiration is for every school’s population to reflect the community at large, where 2 out of 3 students in District 1 have been identified to meet one or more of these priority criteria.

Should the DOE proposal continue? We have lots of questions, and we welcome yours as well.

  • Will the new Family Resource Center include on-site enrollment with transparency for families to see the chances of getting into their top-choice schools, and for schools to monitor outreach and integration progress?

  • How will the DOE give priority to students with disabilities when considering equity in our schools?

  • Will this plan change the fact that students in temporary housing are concentrated in just a few schools?

  • Given that the DOE proposal relies solely on free/reduced lunch status as the primary priority indicator, how will the Department maintain data quality under the Mayor’s new policy, which we support, for universal free lunch?

  • To assure fairness, how will the DOE protect against gaming the system when families fill out their applications?

  • We have been advocating that the goal should be that all schools reflect the demographics of the community, within +/- 5% of key indicators. Why does DOE feel that a wider range of +/- 10% for a basket of indicators is good enough to achieve equity? Why is lowering the bar of success better than honestly addressing shortfalls?

  • Will there be a new enrollment form for pre-k and kindergarten that makes it possible for DOE to identify priority students? Given that student needs are not identified until kindergarten, will DOE rely on self-reporting language, income, housing, or disability status? Or will this all be guesswork?

  • Will DOE measure success based on the November 1 enrollment data after students actually enroll? Or will it be based on the less accurate application data from September, like the current set-asides?

  • How specifically will DOE provide transparency on district-wide and school-level data for the public to monitor progress?

But perhaps our biggest question is: why did the DOE and the Mayor ignore the grassroots effort to research and propose an evidence-based plan, in favor of something brand new and untested?

Stay tuned for more updates. And please forward this email to other parents and friends. Ask them to sign up for the Community Education Council District 1 list serve: https://cecd1.org/signup/

 

You made it! 😄! Congratulations! Happy Summer! Inside: Special Education; summer, HS, college info; Research: ‘An Integrated FRC’, news

Special Education Resources

Include NYC

Citywide Council on Special Education

ARISE Coalition (Action for Reform in Special Education)

The Research Alliance for New York City Schools

Summer School, High School, College Info.

Summer School

High School

  • NYC School Finder:
    • DOE, “Use the summer to research choices for your High School Application—visit NYC School Finder on your mobile or desktop device to search New York City’s high schools and find programs for your application.  NYC School Finder is updated for the upcoming school year and is available in English and Spanish.”
  • Manhattan High Schools District 1 & 2 Summer Newsletter from Superintendent Marisol C. Rosales.  Thank you to our High School Family Leadership Coordinator Natasha Delgado for sharing!

College

“An Integrated Family Resource Center”

Charis Durrance, a graduate student at the New School, recently completed her work studying the necessary elements of a District 1 Family Resource Center in a report titled, “An Integrated Family Resource Center” (publication pending).  The SIPP grant provides for a Family Resource Center to support the district’s socio-economic integration policy. The report (link to Executive Summary) looks at possible policy changes and the limits of single-school integration initiatives, and describes the necessary elements of a Family Resource Center that would support socioeconomic integration, which include:

  • Outreach in preschools, daycare centers, and local community-based organizations
  • Opportunities for social networking among district parents across demographics
  • Comprehensive, easy to understand, and easy to access information about all schools
  • Clear information about a controlled choice process
  • Counseling and advocacy support for parents

A community-embedded Family Resource Center with these elements would be essential to the success of a district-wide socio-economic integration plan because, as the report points out, “school assignment cannot be the end of the story.”

From the report, a D1 Family Resource Center would also need to reflect general best practices in Family Resource Center design, including:

  • Ease of access, including parent-friendly hours
  • High quality, community-driven programming
  • Absence of physical, linguistic, and other barriers
  • Responsiveness to families’ unique needs and feedback; Development of strong partnerships between staff and families
  • A focus on promoting competence and self-sufficiency
  • Staff and program sensitivity regarding culture, gender, and class
News

G&T Inequities

Funding

C-30 process; Park Slope Collegiate 

Diversity

  • No Heavy Lifting Required:  New York City’s Unambitious School ‘Diversity’ Plan (Nicole Mader and Ana Carla Sant’anna Costa, The New School Center for New York City Affairs, June 28th)
    • “Our over-arching finding: Although these targets may have significant impact on the lives of the individual children affected, achieving them would represent only minimal changes to the system as a whole. No heavy lifting will be needed to meet them.”
    • Indeed, if recent demographic shifts that have occurred in our schools merely continue apace for the next five years, the DOE will be able to meet these diversity goals without implementing a single one of the dozen policies they recommend in their new plan.”
    • “The DOE’s leaders, and the School Diversity Advisory Group that DOE has established to help guide its diversity plan, should aim higher, both system-wide and also within the city’s community school districts.” (from accompanying press release)
  • D1 Socioeconomic Integration:  on June 21st we proposed next steps:
    • Reinstate regular and collaborative meetings
      • at parent-friendly times with supports (child care/food)
      • allow for outreach, participation, and authentic engagement
      • restore community collaboration, rather than DoE control
    • Provide resources to make good on commitments
      • put commitments in writing to the state prior to receiving any $
      • fund a controlled choice expert and project manager
      • establish a clear timeline and work plan for implementation
    • Build accountability
      • make data transparent and available online
      • post regular minutes and progress for public review
      • agree on an independent monitor to hold parties accountable
    • Adhere to the terms of the 2015 SIPP Grant, including:
      • Deliver an expert-vetted proposal that includes Pre-K
      • Establish a Family Resource Center
      • Achieve the basic community goal of equity
Future Meetings 

  • CCSE Meeting:  Thursday, 6:00 p.m.July 6th, Tweed Courthouse, 52 Chambers Street, 2nd Floor
  • CEC Annual Meeting, 7/19/17, 6:00 p.m., P.S. 20 (166 Essex St.)
    • At our next meeting we will set the business and calendar meeting dates for the 2017/2018 school year.
    • We will also elect officers for the 2017-2018 cycle

Mayor’s 6/21 Town Hall; Senior Deputy Chancellor Gibson commits to Controlled Choice; Mayoral Control on the chopping block?

At the same time as our CEC meeting of June 21, at which the Superintendent attributed the delays in committing to Pre-K to “complexities” (presented by private Community Based Organization Pre-K programs (despite them not being part of the Grant’s scope and our never receiving an answer to our January requests to the Office of Student Enrollment to detail these claimed issues)), the Mayor conducted a Town Hall in Chinatown.  After the Mayor departed his Townhall to take phone calls relating to the possible expiration of Mayoral Control (which would be good),

Mayoral Control Slides_Page_2

Naomi Pena had the opportunity to question Dorita Gibson, the Senior Deputy Chancellor and the Chancellor’s second in command.  Senior Deputy Chancellor Gibson was previously the Deputy Chancellor for Equity and Access.

Naomi asked the Senior Deputy Chancellor (twice) if they (DOE) were committed to Controlled Choice in D1.  The Senior Deputy Chancellor said she was.  Here is the video link.  We will update this post with a transcript when available.

Senior Deputy Chancellor Gibson:  “We want you at the table to make this work for us.

Does the commitment by this second-most-senior DOE official include Pre-K?  Our highly segregated Pre-Kindergarten programs have always been part of the SIPP grant’s agreed upon scope, born out of a community vision for equity.  As a reminder, here is the community vision of controlled choice and a family resource center:

CEC 16-17 Status Report-2

But the “tier proposal” specifics from April have still not been shared publicly.  Is this, “at the table“?  And if that proposal doesn’t reflect the community’s prior work, what does “at the table” actually mean?

The $500,000 Question_Page_05

We were advised last week that implementation funds (after over a year of delay) are now expected to be released from the State.  But what and how are we “implementing”?  What is the plan?

The DOE still has not shared any internal timeline to implement enrollment changes next fall (last promised in April, and previously promised in January after another admission cycle had been missed and we were asked to “reset”).

CEC 16-17 Status Report

We want to be at the table.  Necessary next steps and a timeline below:

CEC 16-17 Status Report-3

CEC 16-17 Status Report-4

Our timeline:

cropped-cec-16-17-status-report-6.jpg

Year-End Reports, D1

2016-2017 Year-End Report
2016-2017 Socioeconomic Report; next steps?  The $500,000 question
  • And please look at our year-end D1 socioeconomic integration report
  • We outline necessary next steps
    • Reinstate regular and collaborative meetings
    • Provide resources to make good on commitments
    • Build accountability
    • Adhere to the terms of the 2015 SIPP grant
  • N.Y. State is now said to be set to release $500,000 on (or around) July 1 ($250,000 for P.S. 15 and $250,000 to the district) for 2017-2018.
  • How should the socioeconomic integration money be spent?

cropped-cec-16-17-status-report-6.jpg

Reminder:  We are Hiring – CEC Administrative Assistant

Next CEC Meeting
  • CEC Calendar and Business Meeting, 7/19/17, 6:00 p.m., PS 20 (166 Essex St.)

A Glimmer of Hope?  Or (in)Equity and (in)Action?

At our meeting of June 7th, we hoped to see the Chancellor to provide answers to our ongoing questions regarding the inaction with regard to the segregated state of our D1 and city schools.  Instead, we were sent a representative from the Division of Family and Community Engagement: FACE, which has never had a role in SIPP (Socioeconomic Integration Pilot Program) grant conversations.  Members of the public and CEC again asked unanswered questions about when the DOE will commit to a plan to integrate D1’s Pre-K and K classes.  Do we now have the beginnings of an answer?

Last week, the Mayor and the Chancellor released their “Diversity in NYC Public Schools” plan, promised since August of 2016.  The Mayor’s “Diversity Plan” was met with, unfortunately and deservedly, a mostly negative response.  We look forward to providing a complete analysis in the days ahead.  In the Press Release accompanying the plan though, the DOE finally committed to making district-wide “fair and feasible” changes to the inequitable Kindergarten admission process and outcomes in District 1 in time for the 2018-2019 school year.  These changes would take place in next year’s admission cycle.

  • But no commitment to district-wide Pre-Kindergarten changes?
  • No indication of the specifics, if not “controlled choice,” for delivering equity to D1?
  • No commitment to a Family Resource Center to support an equitable process?
  • No commitment to community outreach, support, and transparency?
  • No indication of how the aims and goals of the Socioeconomic Integration Pilot Program (SIPP) proposal would be addressed?

These are not small details.  And, as to the proposal furnished by the Office of Student Enrollment back in April (at a closed-door SIPP grant working group meeting):

  • That DOE alternative is unlike “Controlled Choice” as demonstrated by expert planner Michael Alves;
  • That DOE alternative did not include Pre-K; and
  • That DOE alternative failed to deliver on the essential ask of the community: schools that serve fair and proportionate numbers of students, both the at-risk and the not at-risk.
Our Next Meeting – Thank You!

Media Links

Press Calls for Controlled Choice:

Reactions and More:

Surveys

Thank you parents and teachers for taking our survey! And thank you parent coordinators for emailing and handing it out, parent leaders for helping distribute, and school leaders. The (anonymous) survey results will help to inform our year-end report.  If you haven’t taken it, please complete it online or drop a hard copy off at your school’s main office before Friday June 16th! We will keep the online version open until Sunday June 18th. 

We are Hiring – CEC Administrative Assistant

  • Please apply and forward widely!  If you know of someone who has strong administrative skills, comes from an organizing background, and as a passion for education issues, please let them know about this opportunity.
  • The open listing will close at 3:00 p.m. on June 27th. 
  • Here is the position description on Idealist and the link to the DoE’s application website (application materials must be submitted through the DoE’s Career Opportunities website).  Email us at cec1@schools.nyc.gov with questions.
  • The position will support the work of the CEC with meetings and parent outreach; share information with parents, schools, and community members about CEC1 events and education policy issues; assist with CEC1 communication and reports, and more.

Mayoral Control

At our May calendar meeting, we passed a resolution on Mayoral Control of Schools. In District One, we have seen the negative effects that centralization has on local communities Since the inception of mayoral control and the removal of authority from local decision makers like the superintendents and elected bodies, many of our shared values have gone ignored to a common detriment, with the negative effects experienced most by the most at-risk.  And shifts in administrative governance under Chancellor Fariña have not done enough to empower parents, strengthen school communities, and improve schools. CEC 1 believes that Mayoral Control should not be renewed and at the very least the following improvements are essential:
  1. The Community School Districts should be restored to their lawful place in the governance structure, and district superintendents should have real power returned to them as intended by law.
  2. The District Leadership Team should hold final authorization on policy proposals handed down by DoE central. It is expected that Superintendents, through their collaboration with the District Leadership Team, shall be able to negotiate on behalf of the district community to derive policy solutions that fit our needs.
  3. The powers of District CECs should be expanded to allow for a meaningful vote regarding any significant changes in school utilization, including phase-outs, grade reconfigurations, re-sitings, closings/openings, and charter/public school co-locations. The PEP must provide an explanation as to why they are not following a decision by the CEC regarding any significant school changes.
  4. The Panel for Education Policy should be reformed so that the borough presidents each appoint one member (and they must have a child in a New York City Public School) and so that the Mayor not be allowed to appoint the majority of members to the PEP.  A reformed PEP would be comprised of Five Borough President Appointees, Four Mayoral Appointees, 1 Selection by the Citywide and Community District Education Councils (Citywide/CECs), 1 Public Advocate Appointee, and 1 Comptroller Appointee.
CEC Meeting
  • CEC Calendar Meeting, 6/21/17, 6:00pm, PS 20 (166 Essex St.)

Survey; School governance (mayoral control & more, 5/24); CEC1 is hiring

Parent Survey; Teacher Survey
Our District 1 survey is live. We will be tabling at schools over the next couple of weeks to collect responses. Please take it online or fill out a copy when you can. What have been your experiences this year?  What changes would you like to see?  Responses are anonymous. (See PDF version for all questions).
Parent Survey, English (or PDF)
Parent Survey, Spanish (or PDF)
Parent Survey, Chinese (PDF only)
Teacher/School Staff/Administrator Survey (PDF)
Wednesday night: School governance, D1 end-of-year report, SIPP update
On Saturday morning, the Chancellor spoke to the Education Council Consortium (ECC), made up of CEC and Citywide Council members from across the city and responded to a presentation from the Equity & Diversity Working Group.
The Chancellor agreed to attend (or send a representative to) Wednesday night’s meeting to address our ongoing questions regarding the commitment of words but not action with regard to the segregated state of our D1 and city schools.
Join us for this discussion and for:
* The Superintendent’s year-end report and safety & bullying protocols
*  School governance: parents’ roles in school decision-making under mayoral control.
*  Mayoral control is the school governance system that we have, unlike the elected school boards in most of the country that grant parents decision-making power.
Agenda
*  Wednesday 5/24: CEC1 Calendar meeting
*  6:00 to 8:30pm at PS 20 (166 Essex St.).
*  Refreshments and childcare provided. Please RSVP for childcare to cec1@schools.nyc.gov.
CEC1 Flyer 5.24.17 School Governance
CEC1 is Hiring
CEC1 is looking for an Administrative Assistant/Education Organizer to support the work of the council.
The AA supports the CEC with meetings and parent outreach; shares information with parents, schools, and community members about CEC1 events and education policy issues; assists with CEC1 communication and reports, and more. If you know of someone who has strong administrative skills, comes from an organizing background, and as a passion for education issues, please let them know about the opportunity.
Only application materials submitted through the DoE’s Career Opportunities website will be considered. A link to the DoE job posting will be posted on cecd1.org as soon as it is available.
Future Meetings
*  CEC Business Meeting (Agenda), 6/7/17, 6:00pm, PS 20 (166 Essex St.)
*  CEC Calendar Meeting, 6/21/17, 6:00pm, PS 20 (166 Essex St.)

What We Want to See in a Plan to Address Our Segregated D1 Schools

The District 1 community has long advocated for a plan to address our segregated schools.  We want to see a plan that:

*Assigns incoming Pre-K and K students at every district school and program so as to ensure they serve a fair number of at-risk students from the following groups:
* Low Socio-Economic Status; English Language Learners; Students in Temporary Housing; Students with Disabilities;
* Accommodates parent preference and sibling priority;
* Measures socio-economic status by household income, the educational attainment of a parent, and number of adults and minors in the household; and
* Takes into account transfers & over-the-counter students and Dual Language and G&T programs.

Just such a plan (“Controlled Choice”) has the support of many of our schools as made clear via the numerous resolutions by SLTs, PTAs, Presidents’ Council, the local community board, and CEC1, and by numerous elected and other allies across the city.

* Controlled Choice is equitable.
* Controlled Choice is effective at both reducing segregation and improving student performance.
* Controlled Choice is achievable in Community School District 1.

Short of Controlled Choice, any alternative would have to meet these same requirements to receive community support.
In April, the DOE’s Office of Student Enrollment presented an alternative proposal (to a very, very small subsection of community representatives (a single parent and a handful of principals from the Socio-economic Integration Pilot Program (SIPP) Grant Working Group)).  It does not resemble the plan created by community members over more than a year.
Can this proposal be made to look like an equitable, effective, and achievable plan?  We don’t know yet.  However:

* The DOE alternative is not like “Controlled Choice” as demonstrated by expert planner Michael Alves;
* The DOE alternative does not include Pre-K;
* The DOE alternative offers no timeline or commitment for implementation; and
* The DOE alternative fails to deliver on the essential ask of the community:  schools that serve fair and proportionate numbers of students, both the at-risk and the not at-risk.

Above all, to regain the trust of this community, the Mayor, the Chancellor, and the Office of Student Enrollment need to stop the spin and the stonewalling, the obstruction and the delays, the general lack of transparency and communication, and:

* Share the latest analysis/model with the D1 community for feedback and show how at-risk students would be served across district schools and programs as a result of the proposal;
* Share the results of the 2 year single school set-aside pilot (at The Earth School and The Neighborhood School) with the community;
*Extend the latest analysis/model to include all schools and programs and to Pre-K, where it is a school entry grade (but not the Early Childhood Centers);
* Explain any discrepancies (such as in unassigned students) across various plans;
* Demonstrate how their analysis/model delivers on the community mandate;
* Bring on a planner (such as Michael Alves) to implement the promised pilot of a diversity-conscious choice-based student assignment plan in D1 schools;
* Give the planner any data necessary for modeling;
* Return the workgroups to their previous state of robust community participation and honor the community-centered vision originally conceived by the SIPP Grant;
* Be transparent about grant-related communications with the State; and
* Commit to a timeline for implementation in the 2017-2018 enrollment cycle for the 2018-2019 school year (which would require the D1 community and the DOE to work together to construct a timeline that allows for community support, internal DOE support, and comprehensive outreach to others in CSD1).

Wednesday’s meeting: Safety & bullying; Middle school admissions

Join Us!

At Wednesday’s calendar/business meeting, we’ll discuss:
*  Your experiences navigating systems for getting help with safety & bullying issues in schools
*  Existing complaint protocols and safety & bullying information
*  Positive practices schools are using to address safety & bullying issues
We’ll also hear about a blind ranking proposal for middle school admissions, presented by the DOE.
Join us Wednesday, April 26 at 6:00pm. PS 20 (166 Essex St.) (Agenda). Refreshments and childcare provided. Please RSVP for childcare to cec1@schools.nyc.gov.

CEC1 Safety Bullying Flyer Cal. Bus. Meeting 4.26.17

Upcoming Meetings
*  CEC Business Meeting, 5/10/17, 6:00pm, PS 20 (166 Essex St.) (Agenda)
*  CEC Calendar Meeting, 5/24/17, 6:00pm, PS 20 (166 Essex St.)

Thanks; School Funding & Charter Updates; Resolution & Resources

Thank you!
A big thanks to the community members who joined our meeting last week, and to:
*  Maria Bautista, Alliance for Quality Education (School funding & the Campaign for Fiscal Equity)
*  Joe Rogers, Jr., Campaign for Educational Equity (Students’ educational rights)
*  Jia Li and Kemala Karmen (Parents’ testing rights)
School Funding & Charter School Updates
*  Governor Cuomo’s and the state senate’s budget proposals would strip funding from city schools, change poverty formulas…Negotiations in Albany are ongoing (New York City Schools Continue to See Shortfall in Foundation Aid, IBO, 3/17)

Expected v actual state foundation aid since 2007

*  Join a rally at Cuomo’s office today at 4:30pm to demand full Foundation Aid funding, maintain the charter cap, and limit charter aid. 4/5/17, 633 3rd Ave. b/w 40th & 41st.
*  The 2014 act changing the charter school funding formula expires this year (With State Formula for Charter School Funding Likely to Change, City Costs to Grow More Than Budgeted* (from $159 million to $220 million), IBO, 3/17). *Encouragingly, the latest reports from Albany indicate this change may not happen, and that the charter cap may remain in place.
*  Board of Regents members discussed how charter schools under-enroll high-needs students and contribute to segregation (Chalkbeat, 4/3/17)
 “It seems to me that there is something out of sync,” said Regent Lester Young. “How do you have a framework that allows this to happen?”
Regent Judith Johnson made a similar point. “I’m concerned that what we are doing here is continuing to support the segregation of schools,” she said. “I sometimes get emotional about this because I don’t understand why we continue to support programs like this that violate the principles that we stand for in public education.”
*  The DOE says the 2018 budget would raise the Fair Student Funding floor from 87% to 90% for all schools. FSF is supposed to provide equity in school-based funding allocations. But the formula weights are inadequate to provide necessary services to the highest needs categories of students. Categories such as Students in Temporary Housing are excluded from the formula; all of our schools should be funded at the 100% FSF level; the formula makes veteran teachers’ salaries prohibitive for many schools; schools often over-enroll students to maximize funding rather than capping class sizes.
*  To share feedback on the FSF formula with the DOE, send comments by April 18, 2017 to BudgetPublicComments@schools.nyc.gov, 212-374-6754, or Karma Wilson, Office of Finance, 52 Chambers Street, Room 319, NY, NY 10007. The Panel for Educational Policy will vote on the FSF formula at its meeting on April 19th (6:00pm at Long Island City High School 14-30 Broadway, Queens, NY 11106).
Educational Rights Resolution
At last week’s meeting, we passed a resolution to inform New York City families about students’ educational rights under state law, which include:

*  sufficient numbers of qualified teachers, principals, and other personnel
*  suitable and up-to-date curricula, including an expanded platform of programs to help students who are at risk of academic failure
*  adequate resources for students with disabilities and English-language learners
*  appropriate class sizes
*  sufficient and up-to-date books, supplies, libraries, educational technology, and laboratories
*  a safe and orderly environment
*  adequate and accessible school buildings.

The resolution calls for New York City and State’s elected and education officials to publish thorough, user-friendly information about students’ educational rights and provide all New York City public school families with a copy of the publication by September 2017.
Resources:
Campaign for Educational Equity
*  CEE’s blog, which features the presentation Students’ Constitutional Right to a Sound Basic Education: New York’s Unfinished Agenda.
*  CEE’s Know Your Educational Rights handout series and educational-rights publications.
*  Sign up for CEE’s e-newsletter and consider following/liking CEE on Facebook and/or Twitter.
Alliance for Quality Education
Check out the AQE site for school funding news, including: “Senate Republicans & IDC Stall State Budget Negotiations Over Charter School Tuition Funding.”

Change the Stakes, NYC Opt Out and NYS Allies for Public Education
See NYSAPE’s “Response to Commissioner Elia’s Toolkit“, “How NYSED Should Count Opt-Outs…”, and additional resources to help parents exercise their rights in relation to standardized testing.

Upcoming Meetings
*  Citywide Council on High Schools Meeting, 4/6/17, 6:00pm-8:45pm (52 Chambers St.)
*  Empowering our Communities: Understanding the Purposes and Goals of the Nonprofit Security Grant Program, 4/7/17, 1:00pm, The Museum at Eldridge Street (12 Eldridge St.)
*  CEC Calendar & Business Meeting, 4/26/17, 6:00pm, PS 20 (166 Essex St.)

Upcoming Meetings 

*  CEC1 Budget Committee, 4/3/17, 8:30am, PS 20 (166 Essex St.), Rm. 126.
*  Citywide Council on High Schools Meeting, 4/6/17, 6:00pm-8:45pm, 52 Chambers St., NY, NY 10007
*  CEC Calendar & Business Meeting, 4/26/17, 6:00pm, PS 20 (166 Essex St.)